![]() |
The art of brand warTravelling one early evening back from Joburg to Cape Town, my tired mind was concerned only with berating myself for leaving my Slow Lounge card at home. En route to a rubbery toasted sandwich, I stopped, impressed by this large netted installation of empty bottles. As a proponent of experiential marketing, I quite enjoyed the innovative engagement approach the brand had adopted in proving a cause-related marketing point. SodaStream saved you from destroying the environment through creating your own in-house cool drink factory. I got it. Cool. *Mental note*: I must talk to the strategy department about brand installations. Now back to longing for the free newspapers and avocado soup I wouldn't be enjoying. That was the end of my Sodastream fling. Or was it? The Big Red guy, also known as Coca-Cola, had other ideas though. It wasn't content with my fleeting brand acknowledgement of an indirect competitor. It instead chose to take this very obvious PR trap and maximise its impact. ![]() "Cages" have been rolled out globally, including this display at Times Square, NYC. Source: www.facebook.com/SodaStream. If one chooses to follow Sarah Britten's approach to adopting the Loeries case-study model to marketing and PR fails, it might read a little like this:
You would think that a global behemoth like Coke would have been able to learn from some of its friends' case studies:
So, what are the lessons that can be learnt from this whole affair? Am I saying we should do away with copyright law? Are sponsorship agreements null and void? No. Of course, brand assets and benefits need to be protected as best possible. Laws are made to be broken, though, and smaller brands generally employ smaller agencies with a bigger and more disruptive approach to creative thinking on shoestring budgets. From a consumer perspective, the 99% is looking for a reason to fight back. The cause-related marketing trend is here to stay because caring is cool and supporting the underdog is a bit like hugging a tree or working in a soup kitchen; it clearly says something about who you are and what you stand up for. So I say, let the cliché ring true; if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. The best example of this would be the Nando's vs Santam match-up. After having poked fun at a conceptually intelligent but innately corporate campaign for the yellow umbrella, Nando's proved to be anything but chicken, giving it right back to the fast-food chain with a CSI (corporate social investment) challenge aired on national TV. The end result was the brands ensured relevance among consumers through their tongue-in-cheek approach, poking fun at one another while taking care of those less fortunate. The media were obliged to tell the story, because well, it's what the consumer wanted. And the fight was declared a draw (the win-win type, not the kissing-your-sister variety). In summation, when heading to war, brands would do well to pause and heed these three pearls of wisdom from one of the world's oldest battle manuals:
Source: The Art of War, San Tzu About Mike SilverMike Silver is the founder of Elevator, a brand experience agency now part of the Smollan Group. Mike has been working in the below-the-line and brand experience arena since 2000. Current clients include Lipton Ice Tea, Old Mutual and Pernod Ricard. View my profile and articles... |